ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Bieżący numer Archiwum O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
vol. 16
Poleć ten artykuł:
Badania kliniczne

Zależności pomiędzy fenotypem dziąsła, morfotypem kości a występowaniem recesji dziąseł przy dolnych zębach siecznych i kłach – badanie wiązką stożkową z wykorzystaniem tomografii komputerowej

Bartłomiej Górski
Małgorzata Zadurska
Myroslava Drohomyretska
Edyta Kalina

Zakład Chorób Błony Śluzowej i Przyzębia, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny/Department of Periodontology and Oral Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw
Zakład Ortodoncji, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny/Department of Orthodontics of Medical University of Warsaw
Zakład Ortodoncji, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Kijowie/Department of Orthodontics, Kiev Medical University
Forum Ortod 2020; 16 (3): 187-200
Data publikacji online: 2020/11/10
Plik artykułu:
- Górski.pdf  [2.47 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
JabRef, Mendeley
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
1. Kassab MM, Cohen RE. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 220-5.
2. Albander JM. Global risk factors and risk indicators for periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 2002; 29: 177-206.
3. Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann RV, Haugejorden O, Albandar JM. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian population. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 1377-86.
4. Renkema AM, Fudalej PS, Renkema AA, Abbas F, Bronkhorst E, Katsaros C. Gingival labial recessions in othodontically treated and untreated individuals: a case-control study. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40: 631-7.
5. Bin Bahar BSK, Alkhalidy SR, Kaklamanos EG, Athanasiou AE. Do orthodontic patients develop more gingival recession in anterior teeth compared to untreated individuals? A systematic review of controlled studies. Int Orthod 2020; 18: 1-9.
6. Melsen B, Allais D. Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: A retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 552-61.
7. Johal A, Katsaros C, Kiliardis S, Leito P, Rosa M, Sculean A, Weiland F, Zachrisson B. State of the science on controversial topics: orthodontic therapy and gingival recession (a report of the Angle Society of Europe 2013 meeting). Prog Orthod 2013; 14: 16.
8. Laursen MG, Rylev M, Melsen B. The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020; 157: 29-34.
9. Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008; 36: 193-8.
10. Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of labiolingual bone width of the lower incisors. Part II. J Orofac Orthop 1996; 57: 168-85.
11. Garib DG, Yatabe MS, Ozawa TO, Silva Filho OGD. Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: defining the biological limits of tooth movement. Dent Press J Orthodontics 2010; 15: 192-205.
12. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 109-19.
13. Kaya Y, Alkan O, Keskin S. An evaluation of the gingival biotype and the width of keratinized gingiva in the mandibular anterior region of individuals with different dental malocclusion groups and levels of crowding. Korean J Orthod 2017; 47: 176-85.
14. Park JH, Hong YJ, Ahn HW, Kim SJ. Correlation between periodontal soft tissue and hard tissue surrounding incisors in skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 2018; 88: 91-9.
15. Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 6e1-8.
16. Coşkun I, Kaya B. Appraisal of the relationship between tooth inclination, dehiscence, fenestration, and sagittal skeletal pattern with cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2019; 89: 544-51.
17. Coşkun I, Kaya B. Relationship between alveolar bone thickness, tooth root morphology, and sagittal skeletal pattern. A cone beam computed tomography study. J Orofac Orthop 2019; 80: 144-58.
18. Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O, Peltomäki T. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141, 1: 41-50.
19. Pernet F, Vento C, Pandis N, Kiliaridis S. Long-term evaluation of lower incisors gingival recessions after orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 2019; 41: 559-64.
20. Srebrzyńska-Witek A, Koszowski R, Różyło-Kalinowska I. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines – a CBCT study. Clin Oral Invest 2018; 22: 1567-78.
21. Rasapakse PS, McCracken GI, Gwynnett E, Steen ND, Guentsch A, Heasman PA. Does tooth brushing influence the development and progression of non-inflammatory gingival recession? A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34: 1046-61.
22. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1969; 13: 87-102.
23. Fischer KR, Künzlberger A, Donos N, Fickl S, Friedmann A. Gingival biotype revised-novel classification and assessment tool. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 443-8.
24. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger Tm. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27: 621-6.
25. Nam KY, Kang JH, Moon SC, Choi YS, Kook YA, Kim SH, Huang J. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 481-8.
26. Tian YJ, Zhao ZJ, Han K, Lv P, Cao YM, Sun HJ, Yu M, Yue Y. The relationship between labial-lingual inclination and the thickness of the alveolar bone in the mandibular central incisors assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2015; 24: 210-4.
27. Müller HP, Kononen E. Variance components of gingival thickness. J Periodontal Res 2005; 40: 239-44.
28. Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, Mills MP, Noujeim ME, Lasho DJ, Cronin RJ Jr. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 345-54.
29. Rasperini G, Acunzo R, Cannalire P, Farronato G. Influence of periodontal biotype on root surface exposure during othodontic treatment: a preliminary study. Int J Period Rest Dent 2015; 35: 665-75.
30. Kim DM, Bassir SH, Nguyen TT. Effect of gingival phenotype on the maintenance of periodontal health: an American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. J Periodontol 2020; 91: 311-38.
31. Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 2997; 24: 65-71.
32. Rothe LE, Bollen AM, Little RM, Herring SW, Chaison JB, Chen CS, Hollender LG. Trabecular and cortical bone as risk factors for othodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 476-84.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.