en ENGLISH
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Standardy etyczne i procedury

 
3/2022
vol. 18
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
więcej
 
 
Badania kliniczne

Skuteczność różnych protokołów leczenia klasy II: badanie retrospektywne

Marek Nahajowski
1
,
Joanna Lis
2
,
Beata Kawala
2
,
Michał Sarul
1

1.
Department of Integrated Dentistry, Wrocław
2.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Wrocław
Forum Ortod 2022; 18 (3): 127-143
Data publikacji online: 2022/12/30
Plik artykułu:
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Alhammadi MS, Halboub E, Fayed MS, Labib A, El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod 2018; 23: e1-10.
2. McNamara JA. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 177-202.
3. Tausche E, Luck O, Harzer W. Prevalence of malocclusions in the early mixed dentition and orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 237-44.
4. Bernas AJ, Banting DW, Short LL. Effectiveness of Phase I Orthodontic Treatment in an Undergraduate Teaching Clinic. J Dent Educ 2007; 71: 1179-86.
5. Koretsi V, Zymperdikas VF, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA. Treatment effects of removable functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 418-34.
6. Santamaría-Villegas A, Manrique-Hernandez R, Alvarez-Varela E, Restrepo-Serna C. Effect of removable functional appliances on mandibular length in patients with class II with retrognathism: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2017; 17: 1-9.
7. O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie YW, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003; 124: 234-43.
8. O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I, Berk NW. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 2: Psychosocial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 488-94.
9. Parkin NA, McKeown HF, Sandler PJ. Comparison of 2 modifications of the Twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 572-7.
10. Lagerström LO, Nielsen IL, Lee R, Isaacson RJ. Dental and skeletal contributions to occlusal correction in patients treated with the high-pull headgear-activator combination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 97: 495-504.
11. McNamara JA, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 91-110.
12. Mills JR. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod 1991; 18: 267-75.
13. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 242-51.
14. Kawala B, Antoszewska J, Sarul M, Kozanecka A. Zastosowanie mikrosensorów do oceny rzeczywistego czasu użytkowania ortodontycznych aparatów zdejmowanych. J Stomatol 2013; 66: 321-30.
15. Baysal A, Uysal T. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 164-72. Cozza P, De Toffol L, Colagrossi S. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 293-302.
16. Ghislanzoni LTH, Toll DE, Defraia E, Baccetti T, Franchi L. Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the mandibular advancement repositioning appliance; A controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 684-91.
17. Pandis N. Use of controls in clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2012; 141: 250-1.
18. Jena AK, Duggal R, Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: A comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 594-602.
19. Franchi L, Pavoni C, Faltin K, McNamara JA, Cozza P. Long-Term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 334-40.
20. King GJ, Keeling SD, Hocevar RA, Wheeler TT. The timing of treatment for class II malocclusions in children: A literature review. Angle Orthod 1990; 60: 87-97.
21. Faltin K, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for bionator therapy. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 221-30.
22. Malmgren O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 143-51.
23. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth R. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 159-70.
24. Kinzinger G, Frye L, Diedrich P. Distalbissbehandlung bei Adulten: Camouflage-Orthodontie versus dentofaziale Orthopädie versus Dysgnathiechirurgie. Eine kephalometrische Studie zur Evaluierung differentialtherapeutischer Effekte. J Orofac Orthop 2009; 70: 63-91.
25. Nalbantgil D, Arun T, Sayinsu K, Işik F. Skeletal, dental and softtissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 426-36.
26. Illing HM, Morris DO, Lee RT. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 501-16.
27. Baysal A, Uysal T. Soft tissue effects of twin block and herbst appliances in patients with class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 71-81.
28. Khoja A, Fida M, Shaikh A. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the twin block appliance in subjects with class II, division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages. Dental Press J Orthod 2016; 21: 73-84.
29. Toth LR, McNamara JA. Treatment effects produced by the twinblock appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 597-609.
30. Proffit WR. Contemporary orthodontics. Elsevier 2013: 754.
31. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 391-400.
32. Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 9-17.
33. Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 657-67.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.