| 
                                    	Current issue
			Archive
		
					Manuscripts accepted
				About the journal
						Special Issues
									
				Editorial board
				Reviewers
				Abstracting and indexing
		
			
	
					Subscription
				Contact
				Instructions for authors
	             Publication charge
     			Ethical standards and procedures
			
	
	 Editorial System 
	Submit your Manuscript 
                
                                                                                                            
    
    
    
 | 
                        
           4/2021
	 
       vol. 17 abstract: 
   Clinical research 
Reliability of two dimensional airway prediction method for orthognathic surgery patients
 Forum Ortod 2021; 17 (4): 263-8 
   
Online publish date: 2022/01/15 
   
      View
         full text
       
	
	Get citation
 
ENW EndNote
		BIB JabRef, Mendeley
		RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
		
		AMA 
			
			APA 
			
			
			Chicago 
			
			
			Harvard 
			
			
			MLA 
			
			
			Vancouver 
			
		
		
    The pharyngeal airway is an anatomical region that can be affected by orthognathic surgery. Accurate prediction of pharyngeal airway changes before orthognathic surgery is 
important for surgical treatment planning. 
   Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of two dimensional pharyngeal airway prediction method on orthognathic surgery patients have different skeletal patterns. Material and methods The study included 25 orthognathic surgery patients (18 skeletal Class III and seven skeletal Class II). Airway predictions were made with Dolphin Imaging software (Version 11.0) and compared with lateral cephalograms taken at least six months after orthognathic surgery. Arnett/Gunson FAB (face, airway, bite) analysis was used for pharyngeal airway prediction. Intra-group evaluation was made with Paired-t test, and independent-t test was used for inter-group evaluation. Results In Class II group Soft palate length (Spl), Oropharyngeal airway (Opa) and Nasopharyngeal airway (Npa) measurements were predicted similar with postoperative cephalometric results (P>0.05), although significant differences were found in Hypopharyngeal airway (Hpa) and Deeppharyngeal airway (Dpa) (P<0.05). In Class III group Npa, Opa and Hpa regions were predicted statistically different from the actual results (P<0.05). Conclusion The pharyngeal airway space prediction made by FAB analysis of the 2D Dolphin Imaging software was found to be more consistent with the postoperative results in skeletal Class II orthognathic surgery patients compared to skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients. In orthognathic surgery planning, the skeletal pattern of the patients and airway changes should be considered. keywords: 
   orthognathic surgery, airway prediction, Arnett/Gunson FAB analysis |