en ENGLISH
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Bieżący numer Archiwum O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Standardy etyczne i procedury
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2021
vol. 17
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
więcej
 
 

Ocena grubości błony śluzowej podniebienia przy użyciu tomografii komputerowej wiązki stożkowej

Karolina Wojas
1
,
Kinga Grzegocka
1
,
Małgorzata Pihut
2
,
Wojciech Stós
1
,
Marta Gibas-Stanek
1

1.
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Cracow
2.
Department of Prosthetics, Dental Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Cracow
Forum Ortod 2021; 17 (3): 173-84
Data publikacji online: 2021/11/19
Plik artykułu:
- FO_T17(3)_2021_Wojas.pdf  [2.95 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW
EndNote
BIB
JabRef, Mendeley
RIS
Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
 
 
1. Kyung H, Park HS, Bae S, Sung Jhm Kim I. Development of Orthodontic Micro-Implants for Intraoral Anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2003; 37: 321-8.
2. Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 74-81.
3. Moon SH, Park SH, Lim WH, Chun YS. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: Implications for mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 137-44.
4. King KS, Lam EW, Faulkner MG, Heo G, Major PW. Vertical bone volume in the paramedian palate of adolescents: A computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 783-8.
5. Arcuri C, Muzzi F, Santini F, Barlattani A, Giancotti A. Five Years of Experience Using Palatal Mini-Implants for Orthodontic Anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 2492-7.
6. Lee JS, Doo HK, Park YC, Kyung SH, Kim TK. The efficient use of midpalatal miniscrew implants. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 711-4.
7. Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park H Do, Kim DH, Park YC. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 130: 177-82.
8. Melsen B. Mini-Implants: Where Are We? J Clin Orthod 2005; 39:539-47.
9. Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of Palatal Masticatory Mucosa Associated With Age. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1407-12.
10. Schaller N, Eger T. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa. Pathology 1999: 248-53.
11. Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A. The Thickness of Masticatory Mucosa in the Human Hard Palate and Tuberosity as Potential Donor Sites for Ridge Augmentation Procedures. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 145-51.
12. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa A methodologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 248-53.
13. Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Kim CK, Chai JK, Jung UW. Thickness of Posterior Palatal Masticatory Mucosa: The Use of Computerized Tomography. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 406-12.
14. Bernhart T, Vollgruber A, Gahleitner A, Dörtbudak O, Haas R. Alternative to the median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 595-601.
15. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL, Faber J, Bezerra ACB. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 564-8.
16. Ogawa M, Katagiri S, Koyanagi T, Maekawa S, Shiba T, Ohsugi Y, Takeuchi Y, I kawa T, Takeuchi S , S ekiuchi T, A rai Y, K azama R , Wakabayashi N, Izumi Y, Iwata T. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in evaluation of palatal mucosa thickness. J Clin Periodontol 2020; 47: 479-88.
17. Practice D, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Clinical Applications of Cone-Beam Computed. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80.
18. Januário AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: A novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 366-73.
19. Pohlert T. The Pairwise Multiple Comparison of Mean Ranks Package ( PMCMR). D ostępny w I nternecie: h ttps://cran.r-project. org/web/packages/PMCMR/PMCMR.pdf
20. Foundation RCTR. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2013: 2: Dostępny w Internecie: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
21. Marquezan M, Nojima LI, de Freitas AOA, Baratieri C, Alves Júnior M, Nojima M da CG, Araujo MT. Tomographic mapping of the hard palate and overlying mucosa. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 36-42.
22. Ueno D, Sekiguchi R, Morita M, Jayawardena A, Shinpo S, Sato J, Kobayashi K. Palatal mucosal measurements in a japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 48-58.
23. Ueno D, Sato J, Igarashi C, Ikeda S, Morita M, Shimoda S, Udagawa T, Shiozaki K, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi K. Accuracy of Oral Mucosal Thickness Measurements Using Spiral Computed Tomography. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 829-36.
24. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, Heinecke A. Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27: 431-6.
1. Kyung H, Park HS, Bae S, Sung Jhm Kim I. Development of Orthodontic Micro-Implants for Intraoral Anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2003; 37: 321-8.
2. Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 74-81.
3. Moon SH, Park SH, Lim WH, Chun YS. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: Implications for mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 137-44.
4. King KS, Lam EW, Faulkner MG, Heo G, Major PW. Vertical bone volume in the paramedian palate of adolescents: A computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 783-8.
5. Arcuri C, Muzzi F, Santini F, Barlattani A, Giancotti A. Five Years of Experience Using Palatal Mini-Implants for Orthodontic Anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 2492-7.
6. Lee JS, Doo HK, Park YC, Kyung SH, Kim TK. The efficient use of midpalatal miniscrew implants. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 711-4.
7. Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park H Do, Kim DH, Park YC. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 130: 177-82.
8. Melsen B. Mini-Implants: Where Are We? J Clin Orthod 2005; 39:539-47.
9. Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of Palatal Masticatory Mucosa Associated With Age. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1407-12.
10. Schaller N, Eger T. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa. Pathology 1999: 248-53.
11. Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A. The Thickness of Masticatory Mucosa in the Human Hard Palate and Tuberosity as Potential Donor Sites for Ridge Augmentation Procedures. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 145-51.
12. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T. Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa A methodologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 248-53.
13. Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Kim CK, Chai JK, Jung UW. Thickness of Posterior Palatal Masticatory Mucosa: The Use of Computerized Tomography. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 406-12.
14. Bernhart T, Vollgruber A, Gahleitner A, Dörtbudak O, Haas R. Alternative to the median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 595-601.
15. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL, Faber J, Bezerra ACB. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36: 564-8.
16. Ogawa M, Katagiri S, Koyanagi T, Maekawa S, Shiba T, Ohsugi Y, Takeuchi Y, I kawa T, Takeuchi S , S ekiuchi T, A rai Y, K azama R , Wakabayashi N, Izumi Y, Iwata T. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in evaluation of palatal mucosa thickness. J Clin Periodontol 2020; 47: 479-88.
17. Practice D, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Clinical Applications of Cone-Beam Computed. J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72: 75-80.
18. Januário AL, Barriviera M, Duarte WR. Soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography: A novel method for the measurement of gingival tissue and the dimensions of the dentogingival unit. J Esthet Restor Dent 2008; 20: 366-73.
19. Pohlert T. The Pairwise Multiple Comparison of Mean Ranks Package ( PMCMR). D ostępny w I nternecie: h ttps://cran.r-project. org/web/packages/PMCMR/PMCMR.pdf
20. Foundation RCTR. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2013: 2: Dostępny w Internecie: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
21. Marquezan M, Nojima LI, de Freitas AOA, Baratieri C, Alves Júnior M, Nojima M da CG, Araujo MT. Tomographic mapping of the hard palate and overlying mucosa. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26: 36-42.
22. Ueno D, Sekiguchi R, Morita M, Jayawardena A, Shinpo S, Sato J, Kobayashi K. Palatal mucosal measurements in a japanese population using cone-beam computed tomography. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014; 26: 48-58.
23. Ueno D, Sato J, Igarashi C, Ikeda S, Morita M, Shimoda S, Udagawa T, Shiozaki K, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi K. Accuracy of Oral Mucosal Thickness Measurements Using Spiral Computed Tomography. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 829-36.
24. Müller HP, Schaller N, Eger T, Heinecke A. Thickness of masticatory mucosa. J Clin Periodontol 2000; 27: 431-6.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.