en POLSKI
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
4/2021
vol. 17
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Clinical research

Evaluation of intermaxillary tooth size ratios and discrepancies according to craniofacial growth pattern

Mehmet Ali Yavan
1
,
Nihal Hamamci
1

1.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Adıyaman University, Adıyaman, Turkey
Forum Ortod 2021; 17 (4): 278-85
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2021.112340
Online publish date: 2022/01/15
Article file
- FO_T17(4)_2021_Yavan.pdf  [2.35 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Akyalçın S, Doğan S, Dinçer B, Erdinc AME, Öncağ G. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 637-43.
2. Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Arthur Pardi V, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 303-7.
3. Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior coefficient. Am J Orthod 1949; 35: 309-13.
4. Lundström A. Intermaxillary tooth-width ratio analysis. Eur J Orthod 1981; 3: 285-7.
5. Endo T, Abe R, Kuroki H, Oka K, Shimooka S. Tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions in a Japanese orthodontic population. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 994-9.
6. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-30.
7. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962; 48: 504-29.
8. Araujo E, Souki M. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 307-13.
9. Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas D, Clarkson Q. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 479-86.
10. Sanin C, Savara BS. An analysis of permanent mesiodistal crown size. Am J Orthod 1971; 59: 488-500.
11. Bernabe E, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Tooth-width ratio discrepancies in a sample of Peruvian adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 361-5.
12. Ta TA, Ling JY, Hägg U. Tooth-size discrepancies among different occlusion groups of southern Chinese children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120: 556-8.
13. Smith SS, Buschang PH, Watanabe E. Interarch tooth size relationships of 3 populations: “Does Bolton’s analysis apply?”. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 169-74.
14. Uysal T, Sari Z. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and mesiodistal crown dimensions for a Turkish population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 226-30.
15. Nie Q, Lin J. Comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 539-44.
16. Basaran G, Selek M, Hamamcı O, Akkuş Z. Intermaxillary Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 26-30.
17. Crosby DR, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 95: 457-61.
18. Cancado RH, Goncalves Junior W, Valarelli FP, Freitas KMSd, Crêspo JAL. Association between Bolton discrepancy and Angle malocclusions. Braz Oral Res 2015; 29: 1-6.
19. Sperry TP, Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. Tooth-size discrepancy in mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 183-90.
20. Fattahi HR, Pakshir HR, Hedayati Z. Comparison of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 491-5.
21. Laino A, Quaremba G, Paduano S, Stanzione S. Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among different malocclusion groups.Prog Orthod 2003; 4: 37-44.
22. Wędrychowska-Szulc B, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Stepień P. Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 313-8.
23. Alkofide E, Hashim H. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion classes: a comparative study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26: 383-7.
24. Lavelle C. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 29-37.
25. Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 53-8.
26. Richardson ER, Malhotra SK. Mesiodistal crown dimension of the permanent dentition of American Negroes. Am J Orthod 1975; 68: 157-64.
27. Heusdens M, Dermaut L, Verbeeck R. The effect of tooth size discrepancy on occlusion: An experimental study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 184-91.
28. Freeman JE, Maskeroni A, Lorton L. Frequency of Bolton toothsize discrepancies among orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 24-7.
29. Wolff G, Wienker T, Sander H. On the genetics of mandibular prognathism: analysis of large European noble families. J Med Genet 1993; 30: 112-6.
30. Sassouni V. A classification of skeletal facial types. Am J Orthod 1969; 55: 109-23.
31. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. Elsevier 2006.
32. Savoye I, Loos R, Carels C, Derom C, Vlietinck R. A genetic study of anteroposterior and vertical facial proportions using modelfitting. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 467-70.
33. Manfredi C, Martina R, Grossi GB, Giuliani M. Heritability of 39 orthodontic cephalometric parameters on MZ, DZ twins and MN-paired singletons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 44-51.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.