en POLSKI
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
3/2020
vol. 16
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Clinical research

Relationships between gingival phenotype, bone morphotype and gingival recession occurrence at mandibular incisors and canines – cone beam computed tomography study

Bartłomiej Górski
1
,
Małgorzata Zadurska
2
,
Myroslava Drohomyretska
3
,
Edyta Kalina
2

1.
Zakład Chorób Błony Śluzowej i Przyzębia, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny/Department of Periodontology and Oral Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw
2.
Zakład Ortodoncji, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny/Department of Orthodontics of Medical University of Warsaw
3.
Zakład Ortodoncji, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Kijowie/Department of Orthodontics, Kiev Medical University
Forum Ortod 2020; 16 (3): 187-200
Online publish date: 2020/11/10
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Mandibular anterior region is crucial in orthodontic treatment planning.

Aim
The aim of this study was to assess relationships between periodontal phenotype of mandibular incisors and canines and gingival recession occurrence.

Material and methods
35 patients aged 26,42 (±8,02) participated in this study. Gingival recession height (GRH), gingival thickness (GT), and keratinized tissue width (KTW) at mandibular incisors and canines were evaluated. Cone beam computed tomography images were used to assess alveolar bone morphology. Consequently, distance from cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest bone (CEJ: ALV CR B B/L), together with bone thickness at the level of apex (BTHB/L APEX), at mid of the root (BTHB/L ½), and at alveolar crest (BTHB/L MAX) were measured. Spearman correlation analysis and multivariate regression analysis were carried out.

Results
Gingival recessions were found in 44 teeth (20,95%): 30 incisors (21,43%) and 14 canines (20,00%). The majority of teeth presented with thin phenotype. Some significant correlations between soft and hard tissue parameters were observed. After adjusting for patient's age, gender and oral hygiene habits, association between gingival recession and KTW in both incisors and canines, as well as between gingival recession and CEJ:ALV CR BL at incisors, were found.

Conclusions
Gingival recessions at mandibular incisors and canines are more frequent in case of teeth with narrow band of keratinized tissue and alveolar bone dehiscence. Therefore, the abovementioned parameters should be meticulously evaluated and taken into account during orthodontic treatment planning

keywords:

alveolar bone morphology, gingival phenotype, gingival recession, gingival thickness, orthodontic treatment