en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
Wyszukiwanie
Zasady redakcyjne
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
2/2020
vol. 16
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Wyślij znajomemu
Udostępnij:
Artykuł przeglądowy

Asymetria twarzy – etiologia, klasyfikacje i diagnostyka na podstawie piśmiennictwa

Ewa Sobieska
1
,
Monika Walerzak
1
,
Marta Molińska
1

1.
Zakład Ortodoncji, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny

Department of Orthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw

Forum Ortod 2020; 16 (2): 138-58
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2020.97340
Data publikacji online: 2020/07/18
Plik artykułu:
- Sobieska.pdf  [2.29 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Cheong YW, Lo LJ. Facial asymmetry: etiology, evaluation, and management. Chang Gung Med J 2011; 34: 341-51.
2. Thiesen G, Gribel BF, Freitas MPM. Facial asymmetry: a current review. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20: 110-25.
3. Chia MS, Naini FB, Gill DS. The aetiology, diagnosis and manage- ment of mandibular asymmetry. Ortho Update 2008; 1: 44-52.
4. Haraguchi S, Iguchi Y, Takada K. Asymmetry of the face in orth- odontic patients. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 421-6.
5. Lundström A. Some asymmetries of the dental arches, jaws, and skull, and their etiological significance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1961; 47: 81-106.
6. Kim WA, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Comparision of asymmetric degree between maxillofacial hard and soft tissue in facial asymmetric subjects using threedimensional computed tomography. Korean J Orthod 2005; 35: 163-73.
7. Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia - hemi- mandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg 1986; 14: 183-208.
8. Hwang HS. A new classification of facial asymmetry. In: McNama- ra JA, editor. Early Orthodontic treatment: Is the Benefit Worth the Burden? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Craniofacial Growth Series 2007; 44: 269-94.
9. Reyneke JP, Tsakiris P, Kienle F. A simple classification for surgical treatment planning of maxillomandibular asymmetry. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 35: 349-51.
10. Wolford LM. Facial asymmetry: diagnosis and treatment consid- erations. In Fonseca RJ (ed): Oral and maxillofacial surgery. Saun- ders 2009.
11. BishraSE,BurkyPS,KharaoufJG.Dentalandfacialasymmetries: A review. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 89-98.
12. Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, Kang BC. Maxillofacial. 3-dimen- sional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 779-85.
13. Maheshwari S, Verma SK, Gaur A, Dhiman S. Diagnosis and man- agement of facial asymmetries. J Orthod Res 2015; 3: 81-7.
14. DanaR.Mohammed.EvaluationofTransverseFacialProportions (Facial Symmetry) by Rule of Fifths in a Sample of Iraqi Adult Males with Normal Occlusion. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2018; 7: 129-34.
15. Sxenısxık NE, Hasipek S. Occlusal Cant: Etiology, Evaluation, and Management. Turkish J Orthod 2015; 27: 174-80.
16. Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB. Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55: 811-6.
17. Heike CL, Upson K, Stuhaug E, Weinberg SM. 3D digital stereopho- togrammetry: a practical guide to facial image acquisition. Head & Face Medicine 2010; 6: 18.
18. Langberg BJ, Arai K, Miner RM. Transverse skeletal and dental asymmetry in adults with unilateral lingual posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 6-16.
19. MahfouzM.DentalArchAsymmetryinMixedDentitioninPales- tinian Children. Indian J Oral Sci 2014; 5: 119-27.
20. Maurice TJ, Kula K. Dental arch asymmetry in the mixed denti- tion. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 37-44.
21. Lombardelli E, Fantasia E, Padalino G, D’emidio M, Rodi G. Com- parison Between 3d and 2d Images in Diagnosis and Treatment of Facial Asymmetries: a Systematic Review. Webmed Central Or- thodontics 2016; 7: WMC005220.
22. ChoiKY.AnalysisofFacialAsymmetry.ArchCraniofacSurg2015; 16: 1-10.
23. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomog- raphy in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Acad- emy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: 238-57.
24. GuptaS,JainS.OrthopantomographicAnalysisforAssessmentof Mandibular Aymmetry. J Ind Ortod Soc 2012; 46: 33-7.
25. Almasan OC, Baciut M, Hedesiu M, Bran S, Almasan H, Baciut G. Posteroanterior cephalometric changes in subjects with tem- poromandibular joint disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 2012-39.
26. Trpkova B, Prasad NG, Lam EW, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. Assessment of facial asymmetries from posteroanterior cepha- lograms: Validity of reference lines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop 2003; 123: 512-20.
27. SabahME.SubmentovertexcephalometricanalysisofclassIIsub- division malocclusions. J Oral Sci 2002; 44: 125-7.
28. Kwon SM, Baik HS, Jung HD, Jang W, Choi YJ. Diagnosis and Surgi- cal Outcomes of Facial Asymmetry According to the Occlusal Cant and Menton Deviation. 2019 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 77: 1261-75.
29. Syryńska M, Szyszka L, Post M. Zastosowanie wskaźnika asymet- rii w ocenie wielkości żuchwy w przypadku trudnym diagnostyc- znie. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2008; 54: 142-6.
30. Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Car- olina. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997; 12: 171-6.
31. Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleas- ing faces. Angle Orthod 1991; 61: 43-8.
32. Good S, Edler R, Wertheim D, Greenhill D. A computerized photo- graphic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrep- ancy and mandibular outline asymmetry. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 97-102.
33. Jarosz KF, Bosio JA, Bloomstein R, Jiang SS, Vakharia NS, Cangialo- si TJ. Perceptions of chin asymmetries among dental profession- als and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 154: 201-12.
34. Silva NCF, Aquino ERB, Mello KCFR, Mattos JNR, Orthodontists’ and laypersons’ perception of mandibular asymmetries. Dental Press J Orthod 2011; 16: 38.
35. ChuEA,FarragTY,IshiiLE,ByrnePJ.ThresholdofVisualPercep- tion of Facial Asymmetry in a Facial Paralysis Model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13: 14-9.
36. Wang TT, Wessels L, Hussain G, Merten S. Discriminative Thresh- olds in Facial Asymmetry: A Review of the Literature. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37: 375-85.
37. OlivaresA,VicenteA,JacoboC,MolinaSM,RodríguezA,BravoLA. Canting of the occlusal plane: Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: 516-20.
38. Kokich VO Jr, Kiyak HA, Shapiro PA. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 311-24.
39. Dalla Corte CC, Silveira BL, Marquezan M. Influence of occlusal plane inclination and mandibular deviation on esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20: 50-7.
40. Kim JY, Jung HD, Jung YS, Hwang CJ, Park HS. A simple classifica- tion of facial asymmetry by TML system. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42: 313-20.
41. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G. Craniofacial morphom- etry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop 1993; 103: 327.
42. Uesugi S, Yonemitsu I, Kokai S, Takei M, Omura S, Ono T. Features in subjects with the frontal occlusal plane inclined toward the contralateral side of the mandibular deviation. Am J Orthod Den- tofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 46.
43. Chen YJ, Yao CC, Chang ZC, Lai HH, Lu SC, Kok SH. A new clas- sification of mandibular asymmetry and evaluation of surgi- cal-orthodontic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44: 676.
44. Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR. Characteristics and corrective out- come of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillo- fac Surg 2009; 67: 2201.
45. Uesugi S, Yonemitsu I, Kokai S, Takei M, Omura S, Ono T. Morpho- logical feature of subjects with facial asymmetry with the frontal occlusal plane inclined toward the contralateral side of the man- dibular deviation. Jpn J Jaw Deform 2014; 24: 27.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.